The mechanism of action of GAs is not precisely known. A wide variety of chemical agents produce general anaesthesia. Therefore, GA action had been related to some common physicochemical property of the drugs.
MECHANISM OF GENERAL ANAESTHESIA
The mechanism of action
of GAs is not precisely known. A wide variety of chemical agents produce general
anaesthesia. Therefore, GA action had been related to some common physicochemical
property of the drugs. Mayer and Overton (1901) pointed out a direct
parallelism between lipid/water partition coefficient of the GAs and their
anaesthetic potency.
Minimal Alveolar Concentration (MAC) is the lowest concentration of the anaesthetic in pulmonary
alveoli needed to produce immobility in response to a painful stimulus (surgical
incision) in 50% individuals. It is accepted as a valid measure of potency of
inhalational GAs because it remains fairly constant for a given species even
under varying conditions.
The MAC of a number of
GAs shows excellent correlation with their oil/gas partition coefficient.
However, this only reflects capacity of the anaesthetic to enter into CNS and
attain sufficient concentration in the neuronal membrane, but not the mechanism
by which anaesthesia is produced.
Recent evidence
favours a direct interaction of the GA molecules with hydrophobic domains of
membrane proteins or the lipidprotein interface.
It has now been realised that different anaesthetics may be acting
through different molecular mechanisms, and various components of the
anaesthetic state involve action at discrete loci in the cerebrospinal axis.
The principal locus of causation of unconsciousness appears to be in the
thalamus or reticular activating system, amnesia may result from action in
hippocampus, while spinal cord is the likely seat of immobility on surgical stimulation.
Recent findings show
that ligand gated ion channels (but not voltage sensitive ion channels) are the
major targets of anaesthetic action. The GABAA receptor gated Cl¯
channel is the most important of these. Many inhalational anaesthetics, barbiturates,
benzodiazepines and propofol potentiate the action of inhibitory transmitter
GABA to open Cl¯ channels. Each of the above anaesthetics appears to interact
with its own specific binding site on the GABAA receptor Cl¯ channel
complex, but none binds to the GABA binding site as such; though some inhaled anaesthetics
and barbiturates (but not benzodiazepines) can directly activate Cl– channels.
Action of glycine (another inhibitory transmitter which also activates Cl¯ channels)
in the spinal cord and medulla is augmented by barbiturates, propofol and many inhalational
anaesthetics. This action may block responsiveness to painful stimuli resulting
in immobility of the anaesthetic state. Certain fluorinated anaesthetics and
barbiturates, in addition, inhibit the neuronal cation channel gated by
nicotinic cholinergic receptor which may mediate analgesia and amnesia.
On the other hand, N2O
and ketamine do not affect GABA or glycine gated Cl¯ channels. Rather they
selectively inhibit the excitatory NMDA type of glutamate receptor. This
receptor gates mainly Ca2+ selective cation channels in the neurones,
inhibition of which appears to be the primary mechanism of anaesthetic action
of ketamine as well as N2O. The volatile anaesthetics have little
action on this receptor.
Neuronal
hyperpolarization caused by GAs has been ascribed to activation of a specific
type of K+ channels, while inhibition of transmitter release from presynaptic
neurones has been related to interaction with certain critical synaptic proteins.
Thus, different facets of anaesthetic action may have distinct neuronal basis,
as opposed to the earlier belief of a global neuronal depression.
Unlike local
anaesthetics which act primarily by blocking axonal conduction, the GAs appear
to act by depressing synaptic transmission.
Related Topics
TH 2019 - 2024 pharmacy180.com; Developed by Therithal info.