‘Dose’ is the appropriate amount of a drug needed to produce a certain degree of response in a patient. Accordingly, dose of a drug has to be qualified in terms of the chosen response, e.g. the analgesic dose of aspirin for headache is 0.3–0.6 g, its antiplatelet dose is 60–150 mg/day.
DRUG DOSAGE
‘Dose’ is the appropriate amount of a drug
needed to produce a certain degree of response in a patient. Accordingly, dose
of a drug has to be qualified in terms of the chosen response, e.g. the
analgesic dose of aspirin for headache is 0.3–0.6 g, its antiplatelet dose is
60–150 mg/day, while its antiinflammatory dose for rheumatoid arthritis is 3–5
g per day. Similarly there could be a prophylactic
dose, a therapeutic dose or a toxic dose of the same drug.
The dose of a drug is
governed by its inherent potency, i.e. the concentration at which it should be
present at the target site, and its pharmacokinetic characteristics. The
recommended doses are based on population data and cater to an ‘average’
patient. However, individual patients may not be ‘average’ in respect to a
number of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, emphasizing the need
for individualizing drug dose. The strategies adopted for different types of
drugs and conditions are:
The same dose is appropriate for most patients—individual
variations are minor or the drug has a wide safety margin so that large enough
dose can be given to cover them, e.g. oral contraceptives, penicillin,
chloroquine, mebendazole, amantadine.
The drug modifies a finely regulated body
function which can be easily measured. The dosage is accurately adjusted by
repeated measurement of the affected physiological parameter, e.g. antihypertensives,
hypoglycaemics, anticoagulants, diuretics, general anaesthetics. In their case,
measurement of plasma drug concentration is not needed.
The response is not easily measurable but has been demonstrated
to be obtained at a certain range of drug concentration in plasma. An empirical
dose aimed at attaining the target level is given in the beginning and
adjustments are made later by actual monitoring of plasma concentrations. When
facilities for drug level monitoring are not available, crude adjustments are
made by observing the patient at relatively long intervals, e.g.
antidepressants, antiepileptics, digoxin, lithium, theophylline.
The dose needed to produce maximal therapeutic
effect cannot be given because of intolerable adverse effects. Optimal dose is
arrived at by titrating it with an acceptable level of adverse effect. Low
initial dose and upward titration (in most noncritical situations) or high
initial dose and downward titration (in critical situations) can be practised.
Often a compromise between submaximal therapeutic effect but tolerable side
effects can be struck, e.g. anticancer drugs, corticosteroids, levodopa.
Fixed Dose Ratio Combination Preparations
A
large number of pharmaceutical preparations contain two or more drugs in a
fixed dose ratio. Advantages offered by
these are:
§ Convenience and better
patient compliance— when all the components present in a formulation are
actually needed by the patient. It may also be cost saving compared to both/all
the components administered separately.
§ Certain drug combinations
are synergistic, e.g. sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim; levodopa +
carbidopa/benserazide; combination oral contraceptives.
§ The therapeutic effect
of two components being same may add up while the side effects being different
may not, e.g. amlodipine + atenolol as antihypertensive.
§ The side effect of one
component may be counteracted by the other, e.g. a thiazide + a potassium
sparing diuretic. However, the amount of the latter may not be sufficient in
all cases.
§ Combined formulation
ensures that a single drug will not be
administered. This is important in the treatment of tuberculosis and HIVAIDS.
Before prescribing a
combination, the physician must consider whether any of the ingredients is unnecessary;
if it is, the combination should not be prescribed. It can never be justified
that a drug is given to a patient who does not need it in order to provide him
another one that he needs.
There are many inbuilt disadvantages
of fixed dose ratio combinations:
§ The patient may not
actually need all the drugs present in a combination: he is subjected to
additional side effects and expense (often due to ignorance of the physician
about the exact composition of the combined formulations).
§ The dose of most drugs
needs to be adjusted and individualised. When a combined formulation is used,
this cannot be done without altering the dose of the other component(s).
§ The time course of
action of the components may be different: administering them at the same
intervals may be inappropriate.
§ Altered renal or hepatic
function of the patient may differently affect the pharmacokinetics of the
components.
§ Adverse effect, when
it occurs, cannot be easily ascribed to the particular drug causing it.
§ Contraindication to
one component (allergy, other conditions) contraindicates the whole preparation.
§ Confusion of
therapeutic aims and false sense of superiority of two drugs over one is fostered,
specially in case of antimicrobials whose combinations should be avoided.
Corticosteroids should never be combined with any other drug meant for internal
use. Drug combinations that are banned in India are listed in Appendix 4.
Thus,
only a handful of fixed dose ratio combinations are rational and justified, while
far too many are available and vigorously promoted. In fact, the latest WHO
essential medicines list incorporates only 21 fixed dose ratio combinations.
TH 2019 - 2025 pharmacy180.com; Developed by Therithal info.