Currently, the two most common uses of estrogens are as contraceptives and for hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women, but there are some other indications as well.
USES
Currently, the two
most common uses of estrogens are as contraceptives and for hormone replacement
therapy in postmenopausal women, but there are some other indications as well.
Due
to cessation of ovarian function at menopause women suffer a number of
physical, psychological and emotional consequences.
Medical problems
related to menopause are:
· Vasomotor Disturbances Hot flushes, chilly sensation, inappropriate sweating, faintness,
paresthesias, aches and pains.
· Urogenital Atrophy Change in vaginal
cytology and pH, vaginal dryness,
vulval shrinkage, dyspareunia, vaginitis, itching, urinary urgency, predisposition
to urinary tract infection.
· Osteoporosis Loss of osteoid as well as calcium →
thinning and weakening of bone → minimal trauma
fractures especially of femur, hip, radius, vertebrae.
·
Dermatological Changes Thinning, drying and loss of elasticity of skin, wrinkles, thin and
listless hairs.
· Psychological/Cognitive Disturbances Irritability, depressed mood, loss of libido and self confidence, anxiety and dementia.
· Increased Risk Of
Cardiovascular Diseases Coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke.
The
vasomotor symptoms tend to subside over a few years, but the other changes
progress continuously.
Estrogen
± progestin HRT or ‘menopausal hormone therapy’ (MHT) is highly efficacious in
suppressing the perimenopausal syndrome of vasomotor instability, psychological
disturbances and atrophic changes, but several recent findings have emphasized
a number of risks and limitations of long-term HRT, so that the whole outlook
has changed.
The dose of estrogen
used in HRT is substantially lower than that for contraception. Typically
conjugated estrogens are used 0.625 mg/day (equivalent to ethinylestradiol 10 μg) either cyclically
(3 weeks treatment 1 week gap) or continuously, but there is a trend now to use
lower doses (0.3–0.45 mg/day). A progestin (medroxy progesterone
acetate/norethisterone 2.5 mg daily) is added for 10–12 days each month. Though
the progestin may attenuate the metabolic and cardiovascular benefits of estrogen,
it is needed to block the increased risk of dysfunctional uterine bleeding and
endometrial carcinoma due to continuous estrogenic stimulation of endometrium.
Estrogen alone is used in hysterectomised women and when a progestin is not
tolerated or is contraindicated. Transdermal estradiol (with oral or
transdermal progestin) appears to have certain advantages (see above) and is preferred by some.
The benefits and risks
of HRT are considered below:
The vasomotor symptoms
respond promptly and almost completely. They are the primary indication for
using HRT which improves general physical, mental and sexual well being as
well. Genital and dermal atrophic changes are arrested; vulval and urinary
problems resolve. Vaginal application of estrogen is effective in relieving
local symptoms.
HRT restores Ca2+ balance; further bone loss is prevented and
the excess fracture risk is nullified. When used for this purpose, HRT should
be initiated before significant bone loss has occurred, because reversal of
osteoporosis is none or slight. Calcium + vit D supplements and exercise aid
the beneficial effect of HRT. However, accelerated bone loss starts again on
cessation of HRT. The ‘Women’s health, osteoporosis, progestin-estrogen’ trial
(2002) has shown that even lower doses of conjugated estrogens (0.3, 0.45
mg/day) increased bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, though 0.625 mg/day
was more effective.
Not withstanding the
above, appreciation of the other risks of HRT (see below) has dislodged estrogen from its prime position in the
treatment of osteoporosis compared to raloxifen and bisphosphonates.
Since hypertension and cardiovascular disease are rare in premenopausal
women, and estrogens improve HDL : LDL ratio, retard atherogenesis, reduce
arterial impedance, increase NO and PGI2 production and prevent
hyper insulinaemia, it was believed that estrogen therapy in postmenopausal
women will have a protective cardiovascular influence. This was supported by
early reports relying mainly on retrospective/ epidemiological studies and
those using surrogate markers to indicate that HRT in otherwise healthy women
reduced risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI) and
stroke. This lead to the extensive use of HRT; a segment of doctors contended
that menopausal women should take HRT for the rest of their lives.
In
the past decade many large scale placebo controlled randomized interventional
trials and cohort studies have yielded opposite results. The ‘Heart and
estrogen/ progestin replacement study’ (HERS and HERS II) conducted in older
women with preexisting cardiovascular disease found that HRT triples the risk
of venous thromboembolism, initially increases risk of MI and affords no
secondary prophylaxis of CAD in the long-term. The larger ‘women’s health
initiative’ (WHI) study conducted in over 16000 younger women without CAD found
24% increase in CAD, 40% increase in stroke and doubling of venous thromboembolism
with the use of combined HRT. It was terminated prematurely in 2002. The
increased risk of MI was attributed to the progestin component, since women who
took estrogen alone had no increase in the incidence of MI. The committee on
safety of medicines (CSM) of UK has estimated that ~20 out of 1000 women aged
60–69 years and not using HRT develop venous thromboembolism over 5 years; 4
extra cases occur in those taking estrogen alone, while 9 extra cases occur in
those taking combined HRT. Thus, progestin use adds to the risk.
Contrary to earlier belief, the ‘women’s
health initiative memory study’ (WHIMS) conducted among older women (65–79
years) has failed to detect any protection against cognitive decline by ether
estrogen alone or combined HRT. There was infact slight global
deterioration. Surprisingly, the incidence of dementia (Alzheimer’s) was
doubled.
That estrogens enhance the growth of breast cancer has been well recognized.
However, it was contended that small
replacement doses of estrogens will not induce new cancer. This appears to be
supported by the estrogen alone arm of WHI study in hysterectomized women, as
the occurrence of breast cancer was actually lower (but insignificantly).
However, in the combined HRT group, a significantly higher incidence of cancer
breast occurred, indicating that medroxyprogesterone was the culprit. The
prospective observational cohort ‘Million women study’ (MWS) in the UK found a
marginally higher incidence of breast cancer with estrogen alone, but a clearly
higher one with estrogen + progestin. Some other studies have also implicated
the progestin, and the CSM of UK has drawn similar conclusions. Thus, the protective
effect of progestin on endometrial cancer appears to be counter balanced by the
pro-carcinogenic effect on the breast.
Estrogen is well known
to induce endometrial hyperplasia and its continuous use unopposed by progestin
results in irregular uterine bleeding. In the long-term it predisposes to endometrial carcinoma. The MWS has
supported this contention. The standard practice is to give combined HRT to
women with an intact uterus. However, a Cochrane Database Review has concluded
that lower dose unopposed estrogen does not increase endometrial carcinoma
risk; may be used in women with intact uterus when a progestin is
contraindicated.
A small protective
effect of combined HRT on colorectal carcinoma has been detected by the WHI
study, but this needs to be
confirmed.
Estrogens slightly increase the risk of developing
gallstones, while progestins may trigger migraine.
Tibolone
It is a 19-norsteroid
developed specifically to be used for HRT, which combines estrogenic and progestational
properties with weak androgenic activity. In a dose of 2.5 mg daily, it
suppresses menopausal symptoms and lowers the raised Gn levels. No endometrial
stimulation has been noted. Urogenital atrophy, psychological symptoms, libido
and osteoporosis are improved similar to other forms of HRT. Contraindications
are the same as for conventional HRT, but increase in breast cancer risk
appears to be less than with combined HRT.
Weight gain, increased
facial hair and occasional vaginal spotting may be noted.
LIVIAL 2.5 mg tab, one tab daily
without interruption; institute therapy only after the women has
been menopausal for atleast 12 months.
Current conclusions regarding HRT
Ø The main indication of
HRT is vasomotor and other symptoms in the perimenopausal period. It should be
used at the smallest effective dose and for the shortest duration.
Ø Young women with
premature menopause clearly deserve HRT.
Ø Hysterectomized women
should receive estrogen alone, while those with intact uterus be given estrogen
+ progestin.
Ø Perimenopausal women
should be given cyclic HRT rather than continuous HRT.
Ø HRT is not the best
option to prevent osteoporosis and fractures.
Ø HRT affords no
protection against cardiovascular disease; conventional dose combined HRT may
even increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, MI and stroke.
Ø HRT does not protect
against cognitive decline; may increase the risk of dementia.
Ø Combined HRT increases
the risk of breast cancer, gallstones and migraine.
Ø Transdermal HRT may
have certain advantages over oral HRT.
Ø The need for HRT
should be assessed in individual women, and not prescribed routinely.
Estrogens change vaginal cytology to the premenopausal pattern and are
effective in preventing as well as treating atrophic vaginitis that occurs in
elderly women. Oral therapy may be given but more commonly a topical
preparation is used; an antibacterial may be combined. They help in overcoming
infection and relieve symptoms of Kraurosis
vulvae.
It
may be due to ovarian agenesis (Turner’s syndrome) or hypopituitarism. In
both, pubertal changes are brought about by estrogen treatment, except the
rapid gain in height for which growth hormone and/or a small dose of androgen
may be added. Usually cyclic treatment is given; some prefer to start with a
lower dose and gradually attain the full replacement dose.
While
PG synthesis inhibitors are the first line drugs, cyclic estrogen therapy
(often with added progestin to ensure withdrawal bleeding) benefits by
inhibiting ovulation (anovular cycles are painless) and decreasing
prostaglandin synthesis in endometrium; but this should be reserved for severe
cases.
5. Acne
It occurs at puberty
due to increased androgen secretion in both boys and girls. Estrogens
benefit by suppressing ovarian production of androgen by inhibiting Gn release
from pituitary; cyclic treatment (with added progestin) is quite effective. Use
in boys is out of question. Even in girls, topical therapy with antimicrobials,
tretinoin and other drugs is preferred (see
Ch. No. 64).
6. Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding
A
progestin given cyclically is the rational and effective therapy. Estrogens have
adjuvant value.
Estrogens are palliative;
produce relief in primary as well as metastatic carcinoma prostate by
suppressing androgen production (through pituitary). Fosfestrol is preferred by
some as it is concentrated in the prostate where it may antagonise androgen.
High doses are needed. GnRH agonists with or without androgen antagonist are
preferred.
Related Topics
TH 2019 - 2025 pharmacy180.com; Developed by Therithal info.