These age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in addition to increased prescribing rates and multiple drug therapy leave the elderly patient vulnerable to drug-related adverse events.
ADRS IN THE ELDERLY
These
age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in addition to
increased prescribing rates and multiple drug therapy leave the elderly
patient vulnerable to drug-related adverse events.
DEFINITION OF AN ADR
An
ADR can be described as any undesirable effect produced by a drug, and the
World Health Organisa-tion (WHO) has suggested that it is any response to a
drug which is noxious and unintended and which occurs at doses used in humans
for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy (WHO, 1970). This definition does not
include intentional or accidental poison-ing or drug abuse, and it has been
suggested that it should also exclude therapeutic failures (Karch and Lasagna,
1975).
ADRs
have been divided into two classes: type A and type B (Rawlins and Thompson,
1977). Type A reactions are pharmacologically predictable for the known
activity of the drug – for example the dry mouth associated with the use of the
tricyclic antidepressants due to anticholinergic effects – and are common,
dose-related and usually not serious. Conversely, type B reactions are
unpredictable and usually more serious (e.g. anaphylactic shock with
penicillin). They may be caused by hypersensitivity to the drug or by an
‘idiosyncratic’ reaction.
Unfortunately,
it is often difficult to establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship
between the drug and the reaction. To try to overcome this diffi-culty, ADRs
have been classified as definite, prob-able, possible, conditional or doubtful
(Karch and Lasagna, 1975). However, this classification relies on clinical
judgement. Difficulties may arise when the patient is taking several
medications or when the symptoms attributed to the drug, such as headache or
nausea, are non-specific and subjective. Attempts have been made to improve
precision in the diagno-sis of ADRs by developing algorithms to standardise
assessments of presumed ADRs (Karch and Lasagna, 1977; Leventhal et al., 1979; Naranjo et al., 1981). These algorithms ask a
series of questions in sequence, and the answers are scored to measure the
probability that a given clinical event was an ADR. Questions include the
timing of the event relative to exposure to the drug, whether the event
represents a known reaction to the drug, the possible role of the patient’s
condition at the time and the effects of drug with-drawal and, where
appropriate, rechallenge.
Related Topics
TH 2019 - 2025 pharmacy180.com; Developed by Therithal info.